Profits Should Never Come Before Safety

People Before Profit • Safety Before Savings • Accuracy Before Targets • Transparency Before Convenience

A Right First Time UK National Campaign

People Before Profit • Safety Before Savings • Accuracy Before Targets • Transparency Before Convenience

No company, landlord, contractor, council, government department, public service or other organisation should place profit, savings, targets or financial convenience ahead of people's safety, welfare, legal rights or quality of life.

Our Campaign

Right First Time UK believes responsible businesses have a right to make a profit and public bodies have a responsibility to use taxpayers' money efficiently.

But there must be a line.

That line is people's safety, welfare and fundamental rights.

This campaign examines situations where profit, financial savings, cost-cutting, budgets, performance targets or administrative convenience may conflict with safety, quality, accuracy, fairness or public welfare.

We will not automatically assume that every profitable company, budget reduction, price rise, product change or delayed service represents wrongdoing.

We will follow the evidence.

1. Food & Drink – What Changed, and Why?

Consumers increasingly encounter what is commonly called shrinkflation: products becoming smaller while prices remain similar or increase.

There are also concerns about changes to ingredients, composition, quality or service while consumers continue paying similar or higher prices.

Right First Time UK wants consumers to be able to compare:

Old Product

Original size, price, ingredients, nutritional information and important specifications.

New Product

New size, price, ingredients, nutritional information and what has materially changed.

  • old weight compared with new weight;
  • old price compared with new price;
  • price per 100g or 100ml;
  • ingredients removed;
  • ingredients added;
  • changes to important ingredient percentages;
  • nutritional changes;
  • country of manufacture or origin where relevant;
  • and manufacturers' explanations for significant changes.
If a manufacturer significantly changes a product, the consumer should know about it.

We want greater scrutiny of:

  • ultra-processed foods;
  • high salt products;
  • high sugar products;
  • high saturated-fat products;
  • artificial additives;
  • children's foods;
  • baby and infant products;
  • misleading health claims;
  • misleading portion sizes;
  • unclear pricing;
  • shrinkflation;
  • and significant ingredient substitutions.
Cheaper production must not mean poorer transparency.

2. Housing – A Home Is Not Just an Asset

A person's home is where their family lives and where children and adults should be safe.

Tenants can face problems including:

  • damp;
  • mould;
  • water leaks;
  • structural defects;
  • electrical hazards;
  • heating failures;
  • fire-safety concerns;
  • poor ventilation;
  • defective windows and doors;
  • unsafe communal areas;
  • and repeatedly delayed or inadequate repairs.
A landlord's balance sheet cannot be more important than a child's lungs.

A maintenance budget cannot be more important than fire safety. A performance target cannot be more important than someone's life.

3. Grenfell – A Permanent Warning

The Grenfell Tower tragedy demonstrated the devastating consequences that can arise when safety systems, regulation, construction decisions, product testing and organisational accountability fail.

Grenfell must remain a permanent warning about the importance of listening to residents, investigating risks and fixing dangerous conditions.

When residents raise safety concerns, listen.

When a risk is identified, investigate it.

When something is dangerous, fix it.

4. Damp, Mould & Delayed Repairs

The death of two-year-old Awaab Ishak demonstrated why reports of serious housing hazards must never disappear into a repair system without proper action.

REPORT → INSPECTION → RISK ASSESSMENT → REPAIR → COMPLETION → FOLLOW-UP

Residents should be able to understand what happened to their report, what was found, what action was taken and whether the hazard was resolved.

5. Building & Construction Safety

Controlling expenditure is a normal part of construction. Compromising safety is not.

We want transparency around:

  • construction-product testing;
  • fire testing;
  • product certification;
  • insulation;
  • cladding;
  • structural materials;
  • electrical systems;
  • building inspections;
  • maintenance contracts;
  • remediation work;
  • subcontracting;
  • conflicts of interest;
  • and specification changes made to reduce costs.
If a safety-critical specification is replaced with a cheaper alternative, there should be an auditable record explaining why and how safety was assessed.

6. Public Contracts – Follow the Money

Who got the contract?

Which company or organisation received the work?

How much did it cost?

What was the original value and were additional payments made?

What was promised?

What performance and safety standards were required?

What was delivered?

Did the actual service meet the promises?

Were there failures?

Were complaints, enforcement or performance problems recorded?

Was it renewed?

Was an under-performing supplier subsequently given further work?

Commercial confidentiality should not become a blanket excuse preventing legitimate scrutiny of public money or public safety.

7. Councils & Local Authorities – Savings Must Not Come Before People

Public authorities make financial decisions involving housing, social care, children's services, SEND, transport and many other essential services.

A public body may not make a commercial profit – but saving money must still never come before people's safety, legal rights or essential needs.

Right First Time UK wants transparency around:

  • social housing;
  • homelessness services;
  • temporary accommodation;
  • housing repairs;
  • damp and mould;
  • adult social care;
  • children's social care;
  • SEND and EHCP services;
  • school transport;
  • disability services;
  • safeguarding;
  • roads and pavements;
  • waste services;
  • public buildings;
  • leisure facilities;
  • outsourcing;
  • procurement;
  • consultancy spending;
  • and private contracts.

What was cut?

Was a service, repair programme or support provision reduced?

What was saved?

How much public money was actually saved?

Who was affected?

Were children, disabled people, vulnerable adults or other residents affected?

Was risk assessed?

Were safety, safeguarding, equality and legal duties considered?

Saving money in one department is not necessarily a genuine saving if the decision creates greater costs elsewhere.

8. Child Maintenance Service – Children & Families Before Targets

Child Maintenance Service decisions can have significant financial and personal consequences for children, Paying Parents and Receiving Parents.

Right First Time UK believes administrative efficiency, collection activity, fees, enforcement and departmental targets must never take priority over getting individual cases right.

Child maintenance should be about supporting children – with calculations, decisions and enforcement based upon accurate evidence.

We want transparency around:

  • maintenance calculations;
  • income information used;
  • historic versus current income;
  • HMRC information;
  • shared-care decisions;
  • arrears calculations;
  • payment allocation;
  • Collect & Pay charges;
  • Deduction from Earnings Orders;
  • enforcement decisions;
  • Mandatory Reconsiderations;
  • complaints;
  • case corrections;
  • compensation and special payments;
  • IT systems;
  • private contractors;
  • departmental performance;
  • and the cost of correcting mistakes.

Was the calculation right?

Was the correct income and relevant information used?

Are the arrears accurate?

Can figures be traced through calculations, payments, adjustments and applicable fees?

Was evidence considered?

Was relevant information supplied by either parent properly considered?

Was enforcement proportionate?

Was the underlying liability appropriately checked?

Was an error corrected?

If something was wrong, how quickly was the case corrected?

What did mistakes cost?

What was the cost to families and taxpayers of avoidable errors?

The objective should be simple: calculate maintenance accurately, treat both parents fairly, protect the interests of children and get decisions right first time.

9. Government Departments – Public Money, Public Accountability

Government departments control large budgets and commission services affecting virtually every person in the country.

Cost control is necessary, but financial savings must be considered alongside safety, fairness, accessibility and consequences for the public.

  • Department for Work & Pensions;
  • HMRC;
  • Department for Education;
  • Department of Health and Social Care;
  • Ministry of Justice;
  • Home Office;
  • Department for Transport;
  • housing and local government;
  • government agencies;
  • regulators;
  • and private government contractors.
PUBLIC MONEY → PUBLIC SERVICE → PUBLIC OUTCOME → PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY

10. Essential Public Services – Targets Must Not Replace People

NHS & Healthcare

Staffing, waiting times, medicines, procurement, patient safety, outsourcing and access to treatment.

Social Care

Care packages, staffing, assessments, safeguarding, provider quality and reductions in support.

Education & SEND

EHCP provision, specialist support, transport, placements, staffing and children's safety.

Police & Emergency Services

Staffing, response capacity, equipment, outsourcing and public protection.

Courts & Justice

Delays, staffing, administration, access to justice, digital systems and contracted services.

Benefits & Welfare

Decision-making, assessments, deductions, appeals, accessibility and administrative errors.

A target can measure a service. It must never become more important than the person the service exists to help.

11. Outsourcing – Public Service, Private Profit

Many public services are delivered wholly or partly by private contractors.

TAXPAYER MONEY → GOVERNMENT BODY → CONTRACTOR → SERVICE → RESULT

We want the public to be able to follow:

  • original contract value;
  • successful bidder;
  • contract extensions;
  • additional payments;
  • performance measures;
  • penalties;
  • safety incidents;
  • complaints;
  • subcontractors;
  • contract failures;
  • and whether suppliers subsequently received more public work.
Outsourcing a public service must never mean outsourcing accountability.

12. It Is Not Always About Profit

The campaign is called Profits Should Never Come Before Safety, but the principle extends further.

  • Profit must not come before safety.
  • Savings must not come before safety.
  • Budgets must not come before safeguarding.
  • Targets must not come before accuracy.
  • Statistics must not come before real outcomes.
  • Contracts must not come before accountability.
  • Administrative convenience must not come before fairness.
  • Speed must not come before getting decisions right.
  • Financial interests must not come before people's welfare.
Whether it is a supermarket, landlord, council, government department, Child Maintenance Service, contractor or another public service – people must never become secondary to money, targets or statistics.

13. The Right First Time UK Money vs Safety Test

1. What changed? Was something reduced, removed, substituted, delayed or cancelled?
2. Why did it change? Was it because of safety, efficiency, regulation, budget pressure or cost reduction?
3. Who financially benefited? Did an organisation save money or increase its margin?
4. Was the public told? Was the change transparent?
5. Were people affected? Did the decision create a health, safety, financial, welfare or safeguarding risk?
6. Were warnings raised? Did residents, workers, customers, parents, regulators or experts identify concerns?
7. Were warnings investigated? Were concerns properly recorded and considered?
8. Who was accountable? Can responsibility be identified?
9. Was information withheld? Was important evidence unavailable or misleadingly presented?
10. Was it put right? Was the problem corrected and appropriate redress considered?

14. Our Campaign Demands

Safety Before Cost Safety-critical decisions should be based on evidence and risk, not simply the cheapest option.
Accuracy Before Targets Government and public services must prioritise correct decisions over performance statistics.
Clearer Product Changes Significant size, ingredient or composition changes should be transparent.
Public Contract Transparency The public should be able to follow substantial amounts of taxpayer money.
Better Repair Accountability Landlords should maintain clear records of hazards, inspections and repairs.
Protection for Whistleblowers Workers should be able to raise genuine safety concerns.
Effective Penalties Breaking safety or consumer rules must not become financially advantageous.
Accessible Redress People affected by proven wrongdoing or serious error need meaningful routes to correction.

15. Right First Time UK Evidence Tracker

This campaign is intended to develop into an evidence-based national tracker.

INVESTIGATING
EVIDENCE FOUND
REGULATOR ACTION
RESPONSE
RESOLVED
Sector Issue What We Will Track
Food & Drink Products & pricing Size, ingredients, price, recalls, alerts and enforcement.
Housing Repairs & hazards Damp, mould, fire safety, structural problems and enforcement.
Construction Building safety Testing, certification, remediation and regulatory findings.
Councils Local services Service cuts, housing, SEND, social care, contracts and outcomes.
Child Maintenance Service / DWP Accuracy & administration Calculations, arrears, income data, shared care, fees, enforcement, complaints and corrections.
NHS & Healthcare Patient safety Waiting times, staffing, procurement, outsourcing and safety.
Education & SEND Children's services EHCPs, provision, transport, placements, delays and safeguarding.
Courts & Justice Access to justice Delays, administration, staffing, digital systems and service failures.
Benefits & Welfare Decision-making Assessments, deductions, errors, appeals and correction.
Government Contractors Public money Contract values, performance, failures, penalties and extensions.
Consumer Products Product safety Recalls, dangerous products, misleading claims and enforcement.
Utilities Essential services Pricing, service failures, standards, enforcement and redress.
Serious allegations should be supported by evidence wherever possible. Companies, authorities and organisations should have a fair opportunity to respond, and corrections should be published where evidence shows information was materially inaccurate.

16. Report a Concern

Have you seen a situation where you believe profit, savings, cost-cutting or targets may have been placed ahead of people's safety, welfare, rights or essential needs?

Examples may include:

  • dangerous housing left unrepaired;
  • damp or mould complaints ignored;
  • unsafe products;
  • unexplained product changes;
  • misleading packaging;
  • ignored employee warnings;
  • council service failures;
  • public contract failures;
  • CMS or public-service administrative concerns;
  • safeguarding concerns;
  • or evidence that an organisation knew about a significant risk but failed to address it.

Evidence Matters

  • photographs;
  • videos;
  • receipts;
  • packaging;
  • letters and emails;
  • repair reports;
  • inspection reports;
  • official decisions;
  • complaint references;
  • dates and times;
  • contracts;
  • regulator findings;
  • and other supporting documents.
Do not send confidential, private or restricted information that you are not legally entitled to disclose. Personal information should only be provided where necessary and appropriate.

17. Right of Reply

Transparency must work both ways.

Where a company, council, landlord, contractor, government body or other organisation is featured, Right First Time UK believes it should have a reasonable opportunity to provide evidence, clarification or a response.

Where reliable new evidence demonstrates that published information is materially inaccurate, it should be corrected.

Accountability must be evidence-based, fair and transparent.

18. Official Evidence & Safety Sources

Use these official sources to check current safety information, recalls and regulatory guidance.

Our Pledge

Right First Time UK will not assume that every company making a profit, every council reducing expenditure or every public body making a difficult financial decision is doing something wrong.

Allegations should not be presented as established facts without appropriate evidence.

Instead, we ask:

WHEN MONEY, TARGETS OR SAVINGS COME INTO CONFLICT WITH PEOPLE'S SAFETY AND WELFARE – WHICH ONE WINS?

For Right First Time UK, the answer is simple.

PEOPLE MUST WIN.

Safety before savings.
Health before margins.
Homes before balance sheets.
Accuracy before targets.
Safeguarding before budgets.
Honesty before statistics.
People before profit.

PROFITS SHOULD NEVER COME BEFORE SAFETY

Right First Time UK
Transparency • Fairness • Safeguarding • Accountability

This campaign promotes evidence-based transparency and public safety. Inclusion of a company, public authority, government department, service or sector does not by itself establish wrongdoing.

Right First Time UK Campaigns

Return to the campaigns hub to explore other active and developing campaign areas.

Back to Campaigns